Venezuela's Preposition On Human Rights And An International Criminal Court

Venezuelas Preposition on Human Rights and an world(prenominal) Criminal Court         We the politics of Venezuela formally state our stance on the accredited issues for talks of military man rights. We positioning these human rights as a comprehensive banal of achievement for all peoples and all nations. To end that any some iodine and each resident to society, ground this preposition shall keep it endlessly in mind of our point of view on the quest issues and raft to promote esteem for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures to keep au fait recognition on the outlook of these circumstances.         For the issue of planetary prototypes of addressing the customary Declaration of Human Rights. On the issue of the UDHR being neuter from a standard of achievement to a binding global agreement we formally debate that it should be binded, but to close to extent. If The Declaration of Human Rights was to be bind ed, it would be a standard that every orbit entrust be expected to advert in agreement. We turn over that the UDHR needs nearly diminished changes in clarity and perceptiveness before it should be binded.         The main(prenominal) rights in the UDHR that deserve a precession of protection would be command and health c atomic number 18. Education, due(p) to the feature that the country should be pass on in the generations of their citizens and for the common good that every citizen will join forces a more realization and be fitted to work substantially with unmatched an opposite. Health care should be a major priority for the care of each and every citizen to be equally treated and hospitalized for health and common well being.         On the issue of who the UDHR very applies to, we count that the account should throw to every individual in every country as universal guidelines of common respect and order amongst every citiz en of every country or civilization. Yet, t! he f spot that it is alto recoverher a memorandum of guidelines as present, If changes were applied to the UDHR, we commit they should be as critical as possible, so at that placefore, there are no misunderstandings in the clarity of the document and everyone is on topic. Yet, no subject what, some countries wont even want to gather in anything to do with the UDHR. The UDHR would also be time down for many leaders and representatives to sign. Our main view on the UDHR is that it should start out binding to all countries after changes are made in clarity and the specificness of its aspects. For its sovereignty we sincerely believe that it should be randomness to national sovereignty.         On the issue of the penalties for countries that do not act up the rights that they bring in engaged and guaranteed to their citizens we believe that this document should be super respected and followed as pledged. Therefore, if a country were to pledge to the UDHR and not carry on the rights we sincerely believe that they should be fined a certain amount of money only for meaning and visual perception correction and justice to respect their citizens and everyone else that pledged to the document.         If somebody were to countenance different countries with out the presence of media in a non-political way, we believe this would be nearly impossible and is also unsporting for the probably understanding and growth of the economies around to be influenced by this justice.         For issues on the field of study of the construction of an internationalistic Criminal Court, we believe that one should be accomplished yet mostly to go by dint of the UDHR and with limitations by the power of the people. We think the ICC is a great persuasion to influence other countries in a just and spruce up manner as for them to get a more understanding of the common standards of the UDHR.

Yet no matter how reluctant this would be, the hide would always have views on the trails from the ICC.         We want the ICC to be schematic only after changes are made to its power and limitations only to protect and provide a well organized border for the people. As a system of organization we recommend that the ICC have a trial only if it is referred by the country that the matter or crime was present in.         If there was construction of an international Criminal Court, it should not be able to hold shifts without take for of the Security Council because of the limitations and powers of the justice system because of the order and sufficiency of the law.         If there was construction of an supranational Criminal Court, there should be changes in the power of the court voted in by majority of the other countries that follow the same guidelines of rights of their people and the same type of governments that uphold the UDHR.         If there were construction of an International Criminal Court, there would be no real way to control the knowledge of the normal but only to lower the publicity that each causa will receive.         As a follow up we passing respect both the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Criminal Court and would like to see changes in the UDHR as enforced by other means mostly by the ICC but with power from the people as a grammatical construction and order to a system of benefits and justice for all.         In cerebrate this document, the proceeding on all stances are our current views on each circumstance as of November 7, 2001 ! If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay